|
I. The Relation of the Individual to the Universe
RABINDRANATH
TAGORE'S
SADHANA
<
previous chapter index
next chapter >
REALISATION
IN LOVE
We come now to the eternal problem of co-existence of the infinite and the finite,
of the supreme being and our soul. There is a sublime paradox that lies at the
root of existence. We never can go round it, because we never can stand outside
the problem and weigh it against any other possible alternative. But the problem
exists in logic only; in reality it does not offer us any difficulty at all.
Logically speaking, the distance between two points, however near, may be said
to be infinite because it is infinitely divisible. But we do cross the infinite
at every step, and meet the eternal in every second. Therefore some of our philosophers
say there is no such thing as finitude; it is but a maya, an illusion. The real
is the infinite, and it is only maya, the unreality, which causes the appearance
of the finite. But the word maya is a mere name, it is no explanation. It is
merely saying that with truth there is this appearance which is the opposite
of truth; but how they come to exist at one and the same time is incomprehensible.
We have what we
call in Sanskrit dvandva, a series of opposites in creation; such as, the positive
pole and the negative, the centripetal force and the centrifugal, attraction
and repulsion. These are also mere names, they are no explanations. They are
only different ways of asserting that the world in its essence is a reconciliation
of pairs of opposing forces. These forces, like the left and the right hands
of the creator, are acting in absolute harmony, yet acting from opposite directions.
There is a bond
of harmony between our two eyes, which makes them act in unison. Likewise there
is an unbreakable continuity of relation in the physical world between heat
and cold, light and darkness, motion and rest, as between the bass and treble
notes of a piano. That is why these opposites do not bring confusion in the
universe, but harmony. If creation were but a chaos, we should have to imagine
the two opposing principles as trying to get the better of each other. But the
universe is not under martial law, arbitrary and provisional. Here we find no
force which can run amok, or go on indefinitely in its wild road, like an exiled
outlaw, breaking all harmony with its surroundings; each force, on the contrary,
has to come back in a curved line to its equilibrium. Waves rise, each to its
individual height in a seeming attitude of unrelenting competition, but only
up to a certain point; and thus we know of the great repose of the sea to which
they are all related, and to which they must all return in a rhythm which is
marvellously beautiful.
In fact, these
undulations and vibrations, these risings and fallings, are not due to the erratic
contortions of disparate bodies, they are a rhythmic dance. Rhythm never can
be born of the haphazard struggle of combat. Its underlying principle must be
unity, not opposition.
This principle
of unity is the mystery of all mysteries. The existence of a duality at once
raises a question in our minds, and we seek its solution in the One. When at
last we find a relation between these two, and thereby see them as one in essence,
we feel that we have come to the truth. And then we give utterance to this most
startling of all paradoxes, that the One appears as many, that the appearance
is the opposite of truth and yet is inseparably related to it.
Curiously enough,
there are men who lose that feeling of mystery, which is at the root of all
our delights, when they discover the uniformity of law among the diversity of
nature. As if gravitation is not more of a mystery than the fall of an apple,
as if the evolution from one scale of being to the other is not something which
is even more shy of explanation than a succession of creations. The trouble
is that we very often stop at such a law as if it were the final end of our
search, and then we find that it does not even begin to emancipate our spirit.
It only gives satisfaction to our intellect, and as it does not appeal to our
whole being it only deadens in us the sense of the infinite.
A great poem, when
analysed, is a set of detached sounds. The reader who finds out the meaning,
which is the inner medium that connects these outer sounds, discovers a perfect
law all through, which is never violated in the least; the law of the evolution
of ideas, the law of the music and the form.
But law in itself
is a limit. It only shows that whatever is can never be otherwise. When a man
is exclusively occupied with the search for the links of causality, his mind
succumbs to the tyranny of law in escaping from the tyranny of facts. In learning
a language, when from mere words we reach the laws of words we have gained a
great deal. But if we stop at that point, and only concern ourselves with the
marvels of the formation of a language, seeking the hidden reason of all its
apparent caprices, we do not reach the end--for grammar is not literature, prosody
is not a poem.
When we come to
literature we find that though it conforms to rules of grammar it is yet a thing
of joy, it is freedom itself. The beauty of a poem is bound by strict laws,
yet it transcends them. The laws are its wings, they do not keep it weighed
down, they carry it to freedom. Its form is in law but its spirit is in beauty.
Law is the first step towards freedom, and beauty is the complete liberation
which stands on the pedestal of law. Beauty harmonises in itself the limit and
the beyond, the law and the liberty.
In the world-poem,
the discovery of the law of its rhythms, the measurement of its expansion and
contraction, movement and pause, the pursuit of its evolution of forms and characters,
are true achievements of the mind; but we cannot stop there. It is like a railway
station; but the station platform is not our home. Only he has attained the
final truth who knows that the whole world is a creation of joy.
This leads me to
think how mysterious the relation of the human heart with nature must be. In
the outer world of activity nature has one aspect, but in our hearts, in the
inner world, it presents an altogether different picture.
Take an instance--the
flower of a plant. However fine and dainty it may look, it is pressed to do
a great service, and its colours and forms are all suited to its work. It must
bring forth the fruit, or the continuity of plant life will be broken and the
earth will be turned into a desert ere long. The colour and the smell of the
flower are all for some purpose therefore; no sooner is it fertilised by the
bee, and the time of its fruition arrives, than it sheds its exquisite petals
and a cruel economy compels it to give up its sweet perfume. It has no time
to flaunt its finery, for it is busy beyond measure. Viewed from without, necessity
seems to be the only factor in nature for which everything works and moves.
There the bud develops into the flower, the flower into the fruit, the fruit
into the seed, the seed into a new plant again, and so forth, the chain of activity
running on unbroken. Should there crop up any disturbance or impediment, no
excuse would be accepted, and the unfortunate thing thus choked in its movement
would at once be labelled as rejected, and be bound to die and disappear post-
haste. In the great office of nature there are innumerable departments with
endless work going on, and the fine flower that you behold there, gaudily attired
and scented like a dandy, is by no means what it appears to be, but rather,
is like a labourer toiling in sun and shower, who has to submit a clear account
of his work and has no breathing space to enjoy himself in playful frolic.
But when this same
flower enters the heart of men its aspect of busy practicality is gone, and
it becomes the very emblem of leisure and repose. The same object that is the
embodiment of endless activity without is the perfect expression of beauty and
peace within.
Science here warns
us that we are mistaken, that the purpose of a flower is nothing but what is
outwardly manifested, and that the relation of beauty and sweetness which we
think it bears to us is all our own making, gratuitous and imaginary.
But our heart replies
that we are not in the least mistaken. In the sphere of nature the flower carries
with it a certificate which recommends it as having immense capacity for doing
useful work, but it brings an altogether different letter of introduction when
it knocks at the door of our hearts. Beauty becomes its only qualification.
At one place it comes as a slave, and at another as a free thing. How, then,
should we give credit to its first recommendation and disbelieve the second
one? That the flower has got its being in the unbroken chain of causation is
true beyond doubt; but that is an outer truth. The inner truth is: Verily from
the everlasting joy do all objects have their birth. 39
A flower, therefore,
has not its only function in nature, but has another great function to exercise
in the mind of man. And what is that function? In nature its work is that of
a servant who has to make his appearance at appointed times, but in the heart
of man it comes like a messenger from the King. In the Ramayana, when Sita,
forcibly separated from her husband, was bewailing her evil fate in Ravana's
golden palace, she was met by a messenger who brought with him a ring of her
beloved Ramachandra himself. The very sight of it convinced Sita of the truth
of tidings he bore. She was at once reassured that he came indeed from her beloved
one, who had not forgotten her and was at hand to rescue her.
Such a messenger
is a flower from our great lover. Surrounded with the pomp and pageantry of
worldliness, which may be linked to Ravana's golden city, we still live in exile,
while the insolent spirit of worldly prosperity tempts us with allurements and
claims us as its bride. In the meantime the flower comes across with a message
from the other shore, and whispers in our ears, "I am come. He has sent
me. I am a messenger of the beautiful, the one whose soul is the bliss of love.
This island of isolation has been bridged over by him, and he has not forgotten
thee, and will rescue thee even now. He will draw thee unto him and make thee
his own. This illusion will not hold thee in thraldom for ever."
If we happen to
be awake then, we question him: "How are we to know that thou art come
from him indeed?" The messenger says, "Look! I have this ring from
him. How lovely are its hues and charms!"
Ah, doubtless it
is his--indeed, it is our wedding ring. Now all else passes into oblivion, only
this sweet symbol of the touch of the eternal love fills us with a deep longing.
We realise that the palace of gold where we are has nothing to do with us--our
deliverance is outside it--and there our love has its fruition and our life
its fulfilment.
What to the bee
in nature is merely colour and scent, and the marks or spots which show the
right track to the honey, is to the human heart beauty and joy untrammelled
by necessity. They bring a love letter to the heart written in many-coloured
inks.
I was telling you,
therefore, that however busy our active nature outwardly may be, she has a secret
chamber within the heart where she comes and goes freely, without any design
whatsoever. There the fire of her workshop is transformed into lamps of a festival,
the noise of her factory is heard like music. The iron chain of cause and effect
sounds heavily outside in nature, but in the human heart its unalloyed delight
seems to sound, as it were, like the golden strings of a harp.
It indeed seems
to be wonderful that nature has these two aspects at one and the same time,
and so antithetical--one being of thraldom and the other of freedom. In the
same form, sound, colour, and taste two contrary notes are heard, one of necessity
and the other of joy. Outwardly nature is busy and restless, inwardly she is
all silence and peace. She has toil on one side and leisure on the other. You
see her bondage only when you see her from without, but within her heart is
a limitless beauty.
Our seer says,
"From joy are born all creatures, by joy they are sustained, towards joy
they progress, and into joy they enter."
Not that he ignores
law, or that his contemplation of this infinite joy is born of the intoxication
produced by an indulgence in abstract thought. He fully recognises the inexorable
laws of nature, and says, "Fire burns for fear of him (i.e. by his law);
the sun shines by fear of him; and for fear of him the wind, the clouds, and
death perform their offices." It is a reign of iron rule, ready to punish
the least transgression. Yet the poet chants the glad song, "From joy are
born all creatures, by joy they are sustained, towards joy they progress, and
into joy they enter."
The immortal being
manifests himself in joy-form. 40 His manifestation in creation is out of his
fullness of joy. It is the nature of this abounding joy to realise itself in
form which is law. The joy, which is without form, must create, must translate
itself into forms. The joy of the singer is expressed in the form of a song,
that of the poet in the form of a poem. Man in his rôle of a creator is
ever creating forms, and they come out of his abounding joy.
This joy, whose
other name is love, must by its very nature have duality for its realisation.
When the singer has his inspiration he makes himself into two; he has within
him his other self as the hearer, and the outside audience is merely an extension
of this other self of his. The lover seeks his own other self in his beloved.
It is the joy that creates this separation, in order to realise through obstacles
of union.
The amritam, the
immortal bliss, has made himself into two. Our soul is the loved one, it is
his other self. We are separate; but if this separation were absolute, then
there would have been absolute misery and unmitigated evil in this world. Then
from untruth we never could reach truth, and from sin we never could hope to
attain purity of heart; then all opposites would ever remain opposites, and
we could never find a medium through which our differences could ever tend to
meet. Then we could have no language, no understanding, no blending of hearts,
no co-operation in life. But on the contrary, we find that the separateness
of objects is in a fluid state. Their individualities are even changing, they
are meeting and merging into each other, till science itself is turning into
metaphysics, matter losing its boundaries, and the definition of life becoming
more and more indefinite.
Yes, our individual
soul has been separated from the supreme soul, but this has not been from alienation
but from the fullness of love. It is for that reason that untruths, sufferings,
and evils are not at a standstill; the human soul can defy them, can overcome
them, nay, can altogether transform them into new power and beauty.
The singer is translating
his song into singing, his joy into forms, and the hearer has to translate back
the singing into the original joy; then the communion between the singer and
the hearer is complete. The infinite joy is manifesting itself in manifold forms,
taking upon itself the bondage of law, and we fulfil our destiny when we go
back from forms to joy, from law to the love, when we untie the knot of the
finite and hark back to the infinite.
The human soul
is on its journey from the law to love, from discipline to liberation, from
the moral plane to the spiritual. Buddha preached the discipline of self-restraint
and moral life; it is a complete acceptance of law. But this bondage of law
cannot be an end by itself; by mastering it thoroughly we acquire the means
of getting beyond it. It is going back to Brahma, to the infinite love, which
is manifesting itself through the finite forms of law. Buddha names it Brahma-vihara,
the joy of living in Brahma. He who wants to reach this stage, according to
Buddha, "shall deceive none, entertain no hatred for anybody, and never
wish to injure through anger. He shall have measureless love for all creatures,
even as a mother has for her only child, whom she protects with her own life.
Up above, below, and all around him he shall extend his love, which is without
bounds and obstacles, and which is free from all cruelty and antagonism. While
standing, sitting, walking, lying down, till he fall asleep, he shall keep his
mind active in this exercise of universal goodwill."
Want of love is
a degree of callousness; for love is the perfection of consciousness. We do
not love because we do not comprehend, or rather we do not comprehend because
we do not love. For love is the ultimate meaning of everything around us. It
is not a mere sentiment; it is truth; it is the joy that is at the root of all
creation. It is the white light of pure consciousness that emanates from Brahma.
So, to be one with this sarvanubhuh, this all-feeling being who is in the external
sky, as well as in our inner soul, we must attain to that summit of consciousness,
which is love: Who could have breathed or moved if the sky were not filled with
joy, with love? 41 It is through the heightening of our consciousness into love,
and extending it all over the world, that we can attain Brahma-vihara, communion
with this infinite joy.
Love spontaneously
gives itself in endless gifts. But these gifts lose their fullest significance
if through them we do not reach that love, which is the giver. To do that, we
must have love in our own heart. He who has no love in him values the gifts
of his lover only according to their usefulness. But utility is temporary and
partial. It can never occupy our whole being; what is useful only touches us
at the point where we have some want. When the want is satisfied, utility becomes
a burden if it still persists. On the other hand, a mere token is of permanent
worth to us when we have love in our heart. For it is not for any special use.
It is an end in itself; it is for our whole being and therefore can never tire
us.
The question is,
In what manner do we accept this world, which is a perfect gift of joy? Have
we been able to receive it in our heart where we keep enshrined things that
are of deathless value to us? We are frantically busy making use of the forces
of the universe to gain more and more power; we feed and we clothe ourselves
from its stores, we scramble for its riches, and it becomes for us a field of
fierce competition. But were we born for this, to extend our proprietary rights
over this world and make of it a marketable commodity? When our whole mind is
bent only upon making use of this world it loses for us its true value. We make
it cheap by our sordid desires; and thus to the end of our days we only try
to feed upon it and miss its truth, just like the greedy child who tears leaves
from a precious book and tries to swallow them.
In the lands where
cannibalism is prevalent man looks upon man as his food. In such a country civilisation
can never thrive, for there man loses his higher value and is made common indeed.
But there are other kinds of cannibalism, perhaps not so gross, but not less
heinous, for which one need not travel far. In countries higher in the scale
of civilisation we find sometimes man looked upon as a mere body, and he is
bought and sold in the market by the price of his flesh only. And sometimes
he gets his sole value from being useful; he is made into a machine, and is
traded upon by the man of money to acquire for him more money. Thus our lust,
our greed, our love of comfort result in cheapening man to his lowest value.
It is self deception on a large scale. Our desires blind us to the truth that
there is in man, and this is the greatest wrong done by ourselves to our own
soul. It deadens our consciousness, and is but a gradual method of spiritual
suicide. It produces ugly sores in the body of civilisation, gives rise to its
hovels and brothels, its vindictive penal codes, its cruel prison systems, its
organised method of exploiting foreign races to the extent of permanently injuring
them by depriving them of the discipline of self- government and means of self-defence.
Of course man is
useful to man, because his body is a marvellous machine and his mind an organ
of wonderful efficiency. But he is a spirit as well, and this spirit is truly
known only by love. When we define a man by the market value of the service
we can expect of him, we know him imperfectly. With this limited knowledge of
him it becomes easy for us to be unjust to him and to entertain feelings of
triumphant self-congratulation when, on account of some cruel advantage on our
side, we can get out of him much more than we have paid for. But when we know
him as a spirit we know him as our own. We at once feel that cruelty to him
is cruelty to ourselves, to make him small is stealing from our own humanity,
and in seeking to make use of him solely for personal profit we merely gain
in money or comfort what we pay in truth.
One day I was out
in a boat on the Ganges. It was a beautiful evening in autumn. The sun had just
set; the silence of the sky was full to the brim with ineffable peace and beauty.
The vast expanse of water was without a ripple, mirroring all the changing shades
of the sunset glow. Miles and miles of a desolate sandbank lay like a huge amphibious
reptile of some antediluvian age, with its scales glistening in shining colours.
As our boat was silently gliding by the precipitous river-bank, riddled with
the nest-holes of a colony of birds, suddenly a big fish leapt up to the surface
of the water and then disappeared, displaying on its vanishing figure all the
colours of the evening sky. It drew aside for a moment the many-coloured screen
behind which there was a silent world full of the joy of life. It came up from
the depths of its mysterious dwelling with a beautiful dancing motion and added
its own music to the silent symphony of the dying day. I felt as if I had a
friendly greeting from an alien world in its own language, and it touched my
heart with a flash of gladness. Then suddenly the man at the helm exclaimed
with a distinct note of regret, "Ah, what a big fish!" It at once
brought before his vision the picture of the fish caught and made ready for
his supper. He could only look at the fish through his desire, and thus missed
the whole truth of its existence. But man is not entirely an animal. He aspires
to a spiritual vision, which is the vision of the whole truth. This gives him
the highest delight, because it reveals to him the deepest harmony that exists
between him and his surroundings. It is our desires that limit the scope of
our self-realisation, hinder our extension of consciousness, and give rise to
sin, which is the innermost barrier that keeps us apart from our God, setting
up disunion and the arrogance of exclusiveness. For sin is not one mere action,
but it is an attitude of life which takes for granted that our goal is finite,
that our self is the ultimate truth, and that we are not all essentially one
but exist each for his own separate individual existence.
So I repeat we
never can have a true view of man unless we have a love for him. Civilisation
must be judged and prized, not by the amount of power it has developed, but
by how much it has evolved and given expression to, by its laws and institutions,
the love of humanity. The first question and the last which it has to answer
is, Whether and how far it recognises man more as a spirit than a machine? Whenever
some ancient civilisation fell into decay and died, it was owing to causes which
produced callousness of heart and led to the cheapening of man's worth; when
either the state or some powerful group of men began to look upon the people
as a mere instrument of their power; when, by compelling weaker races to slavery
and trying to keep them down by every means, man struck at the foundation of
his greatness, his own love of freedom and fair-play. Civilisation can never
sustain itself upon cannibalism of any form. For that by which alone man is
true can only be nourished by love and justice.
As with man, so
with this universe. When we look at the world through the veil of our desires
we make it small and narrow, and fail to perceive its full truth. Of course
it is obvious that the world serves us and fulfils our needs, but our relation
to it does not end there. We are bound to it with a deeper and truer bond than
that of necessity. Our soul is drawn to it; our love of life is really our wish
to continue our relation with this great world. This relation is one of love.
We are glad that we are in it; we are attached to it with numberless threads,
which extend from this earth to the stars. Man foolishly tries to prove his
superiority by imagining his radical separateness from what he calls his physical
world, which, in his blind fanaticism, he sometimes goes to the extent of ignoring
altogether, holding it at his direst enemy. Yet the more his knowledge progresses,
the more it becomes difficult for man to establish this separateness, and all
the imaginary boundaries he had set up around himself vanish one after another.
Every time we lose some of our badges of absolute distinction by which we conferred
upon our humanity the right to hold itself apart from its surroundings, it gives
us a shock of humiliation. But we have to submit to this. If we set up our pride
on the path of our self-realisation to create divisions and disunion, then it
must sooner or later come under the wheels of truth and be ground to dust. No,
we are not burdened with some monstrous superiority, unmeaning in its singular
abruptness. It would be utterly degrading for us to live in a world immeasurably
less than ourselves in the quality of soul, just as it would be repulsive and
degrading to be surrounded and served by a host of slaves, day and night, from
birth to the moment of death. On the contrary, this world is our compeer, nay,
we are one with it.
Through our progress
in science the wholeness of the world and our oneness with it is becoming clearer
to our mind. When this perception of the perfection of unity is not merely intellectual,
when it opens out our whole being into a luminous consciousness of the all,
then it becomes a radiant joy, an overspreading love. Our spirit finds its larger
self in the whole world, and is filled with an absolute certainty that it is
immortal. It dies a hundred times in its enclosures of self; for separateness
is doomed to die, it cannot be made eternal. But it never can die where it is
one with the all, for there is its truth, its joy. When a man feels the rhythmic
throb of the soul-life of the whole world in his own soul, then is he free.
Then he enters into the secret courting that goes on between this beautiful
world-bride, veiled with the veil of the many-coloured finiteness, and the paramatmam,
the bridegroom, in his spotless white. Then he knows that he is the partaker
of this gorgeous love festival, and he is the honoured guest at the feast of
immortality. Then he understands the meaning of the seer-poet who sings, "From
love the world is born, by love it is sustained, towards love it moves, and
into love it enters."
In love all the
contradictions of existence merge themselves and are lost. Only in love are
unity and duality not at variance. Love must be one and two at the same time.
Only love is motion
and rest in one. Our heart ever changes its place till it finds love, and then
it has its rest. But this rest itself is an intense form of activity where utter
quiescence and unceasing energy meet at the same point in love.
In love, loss and
gain are harmonised. In its balance-sheet, credit and debit accounts are in
the same column, and gifts are added to gains. In this wonderful festival of
creation, this great ceremony of self-sacrifice of God, the lover constantly
gives himself up to gain himself in love. Indeed, love is what brings together
and inseparably connects both the act of abandoning and that of receiving.
In love, at one
of its poles you find the personal, and at the other the impersonal. At one
you have the positive assertion-- Here I am; at the other the equally strong
denial--I am not. Without this ego what is love? And again, with only this ego
how can love be possible?
Bondage and liberation
are not antagonistic in love. For love is most free and at the same time most
bound. If God were absolutely free there would be no creation. The infinite
being has assumed unto himself the mystery of finitude. And in him who is love
the finite and the infinite are made one.
Similarly, when
we talk about the relative values of freedom and non-freedom, it becomes a mere
play of words. It is not that we desire freedom alone, we want thraldom as well.
It is the high function of love to welcome all limitations and to transcend
them. For nothing is more independent than love, and where else, again, shall
we find so much of dependence? In love, thraldom is as glorious as freedom.
The Vaishnava religion
has boldly declared that God has bound himself to man, and in that consists
the greatest glory of human existence. In the spell of the wonderful rhythm
of the finite he fetters himself at every step, and thus gives his love out
in music in his most perfect lyrics of beauty. Beauty is his wooing of our heart;
it can have no other purpose. It tells us everywhere that the display of power
is not the ultimate meaning of creation; wherever there is a bit of colour,
a note of song, a grace of form, there comes the call for our love. Hunger compels
us to obey its behests, but hunger is not the last word for a man. There have
been men who have deliberately defied its commands to show that the human soul
is not to be led by the pressure of wants and threat of pain. In fact, to live
the life of man we have to resist its demands every day, the least of us as
well as the greatest. But, on the other hand, there is a beauty in the world
which never insults our freedom, never raises even its little finger to make
us acknowledge its sovereignty. We can absolutely ignore it and suffer no penalty
in consequence. It is a call to us, but not a command. It seeks for love in
us, and love can never be had by compulsion. Compulsion is not indeed the final
appeal to man, but joy is. Any joy is everywhere; it is in the earth's green
covering of grass; in the blue serenity of the sky; in the reckless exuberance
of spring; in the severe abstinence of grey winter; in the living flesh that
animates our bodily frame; in the perfect poise of the human figure, noble and
upright; in living; in the exercise of all our powers; in the acquisition of
knowledge; in fighting evils; in dying for gains we never can share. Joy is
there everywhere; it is superfluous, unnecessary; nay, it very often contradicts
the most peremptory behests of necessity. It exists to show that the bonds of
law can only be explained by love; they are like body and soul. Joy is the realisation
of the truth of oneness, the oneness of our soul with the world and of the world-soul
with the supreme lover.
|